Supreme Court ne banks ko daanta! Corporate loans pe 'casual' approach, individual borrowers ke liye 'pareshani'

BANKINGFINANCE
Whalesbook Logo
AuthorAarav Shah|Published at:
Supreme Court ne banks ko daanta! Corporate loans pe 'casual' approach, individual borrowers ke liye 'pareshani'
Overview

Supreme Court ne banks ko zabardast फटकार lagayi hai! Unka kehna hai ki bade corporates ko loan easily de dete hain, par common aadmi ke liye strict rules aur pareshani wala process hai. Court ne government se kaha hai ki public ke liye loan access easy aur recovery fair ho.

Instant Stock Alerts on WhatsApp

Used by 10,000+ active investors

1

Add Stocks

Select the stocks you want to track in real time.

2

Get Alerts on WhatsApp

Receive instant updates directly to WhatsApp.

  • Quarterly Results
  • Concall Announcements
  • New Orders & Big Deals
  • Capex Announcements
  • Bulk Deals
  • And much more

Court ne pakda banks ko lending mein double standard pe:

Supreme Court ne saaf saaf kaha hai ki banks bade corporates ko loan dete waqt kaafi 'casual' ho jaate hain, jaise koi baat hi na ho. Lekin jab ek aam aadmi ya chota borrower loan lene aata hai, toh rules itne strict aur process itna tedious kar dete hain ki woh 'pareshani' se kam nahi lagta.

Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah aur Justice R. Mahadevan ne isko ek 'chintajanak trend' bataya hai jo system mein bias dikhata hai.

Aam janta ke liye loan access easy ho:

Iske liye, Supreme Court ne government ko suggest kiya hai ki woh kuch policy ideas explore karein taaki aam log, especially kam income wale, easily loan le saken. Court ka kehna hai ki RBI aur banks ke fundamental rules waise hi rahenge, bas loan apply karne aur recover karne ka process sabke liye fair aur smooth hona chahiye.

Case study: SBI aur Bhaskar International:

Yeh saari baatein ek case ke chalte hui hain jisme Bhaskar International aur State Bank of India (SBI) involve the. Case ₹8 crore se zyada ke loan ki recovery ka tha jo SBI ne 2019 mein diya tha. Court ko SBI officials ki 'negligence' dikhi kyunki borrower loan start hone se pehle hi repayment nahi kar paya aur account NPA ban gaya. Court ne Bhaskar International ki SBI dwara property zabt karne se rokne ki request toh nahi maani, par is case se banking practices par sawaal zaroor uthaya.

Loan aur recovery mein inconsistencies:

Supreme Court ki yeh comments Indian banks ke lending aur recovery practices par chal rahe discussions ko highlight karti hain. Retail lending badh raha hai, jabki corporate lending kam hua hai. Par, personal loan NPAs bhi badhe hain, jo retail lending mein stress dikha sakta hai. SBI ke corporate loan approval mein hui 'negligence' dikhati hai ki bade loans ke liye risk assessment mein kami ho sakti hai. Recovery processes mein SARFAESI Act aur DRTs jaise tareeke hain, par court ka kehna hai ki inka practical use ab aur fair hona chahiye taki logon ko zyada mushkil na ho.

Due diligence aur recovery mein unfairness:

Sabse badi baat yeh hai ki corporate aur individual lending mein due diligence standards mein fark hai. SBI ne ek bade corporate loan ko approve karne mein jo 'negligence' dikhai, woh chote loans ke liye hone wale strict process se bilkul alag hai. Isse sawaal uthta hai ki bade loans ka risk assessment kitna thorough hai, khaas kar jab loan approve hone ke turant baad default ho jaye. Corporate defaults ki recovery process lambi ho sakti hai, jaisa ki Bhaskar International case mein dikha. Personal loan NPAs ka badhna bhi batata hai ki recovery mushkil hai, chahe rules kitne bhi strict kyun na hon.

Get stock alerts instantly on WhatsApp

Quarterly results, bulk deals, concall updates and major announcements delivered in real time.

Disclaimer:This content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, or trading advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. Readers should consult a SEBI-registered advisor before making investment decisions, as markets involve risk and past performance does not guarantee future results. The publisher and authors accept no liability for any losses. Some content may be AI-generated and may contain errors; accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. Views expressed do not reflect the publication’s editorial stance.