₹900 Crore Idle: India's UDAN Airports See No Flights

TRANSPORTATION
Whalesbook Logo
AuthorAnanya Iyer|Published at:
₹900 Crore Idle: India's UDAN Airports See No Flights
Overview

India's UDAN scheme has spent ₹900 crore on 15 regional airports that remain non-operational. Built to connect interiors, these hubs incur maintenance costs without scheduled flights. Experts cite issues like post-subsidy unviability, leading to a significant gap between aviation ambitions and ground realities.

India's ambitious UDAN scheme, designed to connect remote areas by air, is facing significant headwinds. The government has spent nearly ₹900 crore on 15 regional airports that remain entirely non-operational. These facilities, intended to boost air connectivity in interior regions, continue to incur substantial maintenance expenses without any scheduled aircraft landings.

UDAN Scheme Under Fire

The total outlay over eight years, from 2017 to present, highlights the challenges in expanding India's aviation sector. Documents submitted to Parliament reveal that while the Civil Aviation Ministry has disbursed over ₹4,300 crore in subsidies to support regional routes, the non-operational status of these hinterland airports exposes a stark gap between aspirational goals and on-ground realities. Seven of the non-functional hubs were inaugurated as recently as 2024, underscoring the urgency of the issue.

Wasted Infrastructure Investment

Uttar Pradesh is the hardest hit state, housing six of the 15 'temporarily non-operational' airports, including Aligarh, Azamgarh, and Kushinagar. Other affected locations span Madhya Pradesh, Punjab, Odisha, Himachal Pradesh, Gujarat, Sikkim, and Karnataka. For instance, Shimla airport, where the first UDAN flight took off in 2017, continues to incur ₹116.70 crore in maintenance costs despite suspended operations. Similarly, the Pakyong airport in Sikkim has seen ₹178.75 crore spent on upkeep after its initial ₹605 crore construction.

Economic Realities Bite

Aviation consultants point to the fundamental issue of commercial viability. 'Subsidy-based schemes like UDAN generally do not work in aviation,' noted Mark D. Martin, founder and chief executive at Martin Consulting. 'Commercial viability comes when there is demand. Once the three-year subsidy or VGF period ends, many flight operations turn unviable.' This often occurs when airlines, heavily reliant on such schemes, fail or exit the market, leaving airports idle, as seen with FlyBig at Moradabad. Some industry players, like FLY91 founder Manoj Chacko, still see potential if the right business case is made, but acknowledge the need for viable airline operators.

Disclaimer:This content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, or trading advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. Readers should consult a SEBI-registered advisor before making investment decisions, as markets involve risk and past performance does not guarantee future results. The publisher and authors accept no liability for any losses. Some content may be AI-generated and may contain errors; accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. Views expressed do not reflect the publication’s editorial stance.