Meesho Reduces In-House Logistics Use to Cut Costs, Boost Profit

TRANSPORTATION
Whalesbook Logo
AuthorKavya Nair|Published at:
Meesho Reduces In-House Logistics Use to Cut Costs, Boost Profit
Overview

Meesho's in-house logistics unit, Valmo, now handles about 50% of shipments, down from its peak. This change prioritizes cost savings and efficiency over full internalisation, aligning with hybrid logistics trends and Valmo's cost advantage for affordable products.

Instant Stock Alerts on WhatsApp

Used by 10,000+ active investors

1

Add Stocks

Select the stocks you want to track in real time.

2

Get Alerts on WhatsApp

Receive instant updates directly to WhatsApp.

  • Quarterly Results
  • Concall Announcements
  • New Orders & Big Deals
  • Capex Announcements
  • Bulk Deals
  • And much more

Meesho Adjusts Logistics Strategy

Meesho has reduced the portion of shipments handled by its in-house logistics unit, Valmo, to about 50%. This is down from a peak of 60-65% last quarter. The move signals a shift from trying to bring all logistics in-house towards a more practical strategy focused on saving money and improving efficiency. Valmo acts as a system that manages logistics without owning all the assets. It has shown a clear cost advantage, with fulfillment costs per order expected to be in the low ₹40s in fiscal year 2026. This is cheaper than the ₹48-51 per order typical for traditional third-party logistics (3PL) providers. This cost saving is vital for Meesho's business, which sells many items priced under ₹200. The total logistics cost per order has dropped from ₹55.6 in FY23 to ₹46.3 in FY25. The company's stock was trading around ₹197 on May 6, 2026, following a previous close of ₹203.73. The stock has seen significant gains recently, rising nearly 36% in the past month. By using third-party logistics when it makes financial sense, Valmo is adopting a balanced approach, which differs from the extensive in-house logistics operations of global giants like Amazon.

Indian E-commerce Logistics Market

India's e-commerce logistics market is a significant and growing sector, expected to reach $11.14 billion by 2031, expanding at an average annual rate of nearly 9%. However, the industry faces hurdles such as underdeveloped infrastructure and high operational costs, which can account for 14-16% of the GDP. Key advancements include the use of AI and automation to improve route planning, forecast demand, and manage warehouses more efficiently. Major rivals like Amazon and Flipkart are also strengthening their logistics operations. Amazon now offers its extensive delivery network to external businesses, competing directly with companies such as Delhivery and Blue Dart. Flipkart's logistics arm, Ekart Logistics, also provides delivery services for other companies. Delhivery, a leading 3PL firm, recently acquired Ecom Express for ₹1,407 crore, boosting its market presence. Despite these moves, analysts believe Valmo's model is cost-effective compared to traditional 3PLs. They anticipate Valmo's share of shipments might settle around 75-80%, striking a balance between cost and reliability. This differs from Amazon's 80-85% and Flipkart's 65-70% rates of handling shipments internally.

Profitability Challenges and Risks

Even with operational gains and increasing revenue, Meesho faces significant hurdles that could slow its growth. Analysts are warning that it will be challenging to achieve lasting profitability without hurting its growth. HSBC, for instance, has a 'Hold' rating and a ₹160 price target, citing this difficulty. Meesho's focus on low-price items and strong competition from giants like Amazon and Flipkart in this segment create ongoing risks. Although Valmo provides cost benefits, its strategy of using outside logistics providers means Meesho doesn't have complete control over the final stage of delivery. This could affect service reliability compared to companies that manage all delivery in-house. The company's stock valuation is also a subject of debate. JPMorgan rates it 'Overweight' with a ₹215 target, expecting profits to rise due to ad revenue and better logistics. However, BofA Securities has a 'Neutral' rating and a ₹190 target, pointing to valuation concerns after the stock's rapid rise post-IPO. Reaching stable profitability may take several years, with some analysts predicting steady profit margins are still four to five years away.

Analyst Views on Meesho's Future

Analyst opinions on Meesho are varied but lean positive, with most recommending a 'Buy'. JPMorgan is 'Overweight' with a price target of ₹215, anticipating significant profit margin growth to 4% by FY31, driven by advertising revenue and logistics efficiencies. They project strong growth in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and free cash flow. BofA Securities takes a more reserved stance with a 'Neutral' rating and ₹190 target, acknowledging solid underlying business performance but also noting concerns about the stock's high valuation. HSBC holds a 'Hold' rating and a ₹160 target, emphasizing the challenge of achieving growth alongside profitability. The average 12-month price target from analysts is approximately ₹187.11. For the fiscal year 2026, Meesho reported a net loss of ₹1,357 crore on revenue of ₹12,626 crore, showing improvements in its core financial performance. These financial results, along with Valmo's cost savings and increasing ad revenue, support positive analyst outlooks. However, successful execution and consistent profitability will be crucial for the stock's future value.

Get stock alerts instantly on WhatsApp

Quarterly results, bulk deals, concall updates and major announcements delivered in real time.

Disclaimer:This content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, or trading advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. Readers should consult a SEBI-registered advisor before making investment decisions, as markets involve risk and past performance does not guarantee future results. The publisher and authors accept no liability for any losses. Some content may be AI-generated and may contain errors; accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. Views expressed do not reflect the publication’s editorial stance.