Telecom
|
Updated on 16th November 2025, 4:19 AM
Author
Abhay Singh | Whalesbook News Team
The Delhi High Court has reopened a 17-year-old legal dispute between Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL) and Motorola. A Division Bench set aside a previous order that dismissed MTNL's challenge to an arbitral award directing MTNL to pay Motorola over $8.7 million and ₹22.29 crore. The court found the earlier judgment failed to address MTNL's crucial objections.
▶
The Delhi High Court has revived a significant legal battle between state-owned Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited (MTNL) and technology firm Motorola, originally stemming from a 1999 tender. This development comes 17 years after an arbitral tribunal ordered MTNL to pay Motorola $8,768,505 (approximately ₹77.77 crore) and ₹22,29,17,746.
A Division Bench, comprising Justices Anil Kshetrapal and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, overturned a prior decision by a single judge that had dismissed MTNL's challenge filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The Bench ruled that the 2017 judgment was unsustainable because it did not properly adjudicate the critical objections raised by MTNL against the arbitral award.
The Division Bench emphasized that courts are duty-bound to apply their minds to each challenge and provide reasoned findings, even within the limited scope of Section 34 proceedings.
The dispute originated from MTNL's 1999 tender for a CDMA technology network. Motorola was the successful bidder, leading to multiple purchase orders between 2000 and 2002. Disputes later arose concerning acceptance testing, coverage, and system performance, with MTNL alleging failures and Motorola asserting compliance and commercial usage of the network by MTNL.
The arbitral tribunal had ruled in favor of Motorola in 2008, directing payment and later ordered the release of bank guarantees in 2015. MTNL's challenge was dismissed by a single judge in 2017, leading to the current appeals.
The Division Bench has now remitted the matter back to a single-judge for a fresh consideration, meaning the substantial payment obligation for MTNL remains in dispute.
This revival of the legal dispute could lead to further legal costs for MTNL and potential financial liabilities if the arbitral award is ultimately upheld after fresh adjudication. It highlights the ongoing financial and legal challenges faced by the state-owned telecom company. The rating for market impact is 6/10 due to the significant sum involved and its impact on MTNL's financials and investor sentiment.
Telecom
Delhi High Court Revives 17-Year-Old MTNL vs Motorola Dispute, Orders Fresh Hearing
Stock Investment Ideas
Indian Market Outflows: Why FIIs Are Doubling Down on 360 ONE WAM and Redington
Aerospace & Defense
Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL) Partners Russia's UAC for SJ-100 Jet, India's Commercial Aircraft Ambition Faces Questions