Zomato's Blinkit Gains Margin; Swiggy's Instamart Still Losing Money

TECH
Whalesbook Logo
AuthorAnanya Iyer|Published at:
Zomato's Blinkit Gains Margin; Swiggy's Instamart Still Losing Money
Overview

India's tech companies are reporting mixed March quarter results. Revenue is growing, but profits are hard to come by due to economic challenges and competition. Analysts note a clear difference: Zomato's quick delivery service, Blinkit, is improving its margins. In contrast, Swiggy's Instamart delivery service is still losing a lot of money, even with many orders. This earnings period is key for understanding how these digital companies can become profitable long-term.

Instant Stock Alerts on WhatsApp

Used by 10,000+ active investors

1

Add Stocks

Select the stocks you want to track in real time.

2

Get Alerts on WhatsApp

Receive instant updates directly to WhatsApp.

  • Quarterly Results
  • Concall Announcements
  • New Orders & Big Deals
  • Capex Announcements
  • Bulk Deals
  • And much more

### India's Tech Sector Faces Divergent Q4 Results

India's prominent new-age technology companies are expecting mixed March quarter results. While robust revenue expansion continues to be a common theme, turning this growth into sustainable profit remains a challenge. Economic uncertainties, intense competition, and significant investments in the fast-growing quick commerce segment are squeezing near-term profits across the sector. The broader Indian tech market, including IT stocks, has seen significant drops, with the Nifty IT index down over 20% year-to-date in 2026. This general market caution, driven by AI fears and investor caution, creates a difficult environment for these growth-focused companies.

### Zomato's Blinkit Shows Margin Gains

Analysts expect Zomato to perform well in the fourth quarter, driven by consistent gains in its core food delivery segment and rapid growth in its quick delivery service, Blinkit. Kotak Institutional Equities forecasts food delivery order value to climb 17% year-on-year, with Blinkit's order value expected to surge by 99% year-on-year. This aggressive expansion in Blinkit is driven by more delivery hubs and faster order handling. Quarter-over-quarter, while food delivery order value may see a seasonal dip, Blinkit is anticipated to grow around 10%. Profitability indicators are also improving. Kotak estimates food delivery profit margins around 5.7% of order value, a sequential improvement of 0.3 percentage points, supported by higher platform fees and advertising income. Blinkit's profit margin per order is projected to reach 10.7% of order value. HDFC Securities upgrades Zomato to a 'Buy' rating, citing strong growth trends in both food delivery and quick delivery, expecting food delivery order growth of 24% and Blinkit holding over 50% of the quick delivery market share. Analysts anticipate Zomato's adjusted profit margins to be around 5.6% of order value, largely unchanged from the previous quarter. Zomato's market share in food delivery is estimated between 55-58%. On April 2, 2026, Zomato's P/E ratio was reported at 988.85 by HDFC Securities, and 967.76 by Smart-Investing.in as of April 6, 2026. Its market capitalization stands at ₹223,551.5 Cr.

### Swiggy's Instamart Continues to Burn Cash

Swiggy is forecasted to show steady revenue growth from its food delivery and Instamart grocery delivery services. Kotak projects a 19% year-on-year growth in food delivery order value and a 23% revenue increase, with profit margins improving to around 7.8%. Instamart is slated for strong order value growth of 75% year-on-year. However, significant losses are expected to continue in quick delivery, with adjusted earnings losses estimated around ₹8.7 billion, only marginally lower than the previous quarter. This is due to fierce competition and ongoing investment. HDFC Securities noted that platform fees were increased by 17-19% by both Swiggy and Zomato to defend margins. Nuvama also expects only gradual improvements in Instamart's profitability, recognizing the continued spending. Swiggy's food delivery commission rate was 25.4% in Q1 FY25, higher than Zomato's 24.3%. Swiggy's valuation was reportedly cut to $5.5 billion by investor Invesco in May 2023, a significant drop from its previous valuation. Swiggy has raised $3.62 billion to date.

### Market Performance and Valuations

In recent trading, Zomato shares closed 0.21% higher at ₹232.20 on Monday, April 6, 2026, and have risen 10.29% over the last 12 months, even as shares have fallen 18.18% year-to-date. Swiggy shares closed 1.29% lower at ₹271.80 on Monday, and have fallen 15.51% in the past year and 30.43% year-to-date. In the March quarter alone, Swiggy shares fell 33.44%, while Zomato shares fell 19.32%. HDFC Securities has upgraded Swiggy to a BUY rating with a target price of ₹460, implying a potential to rise over 70%, and Zomato to BUY with a target price of ₹340, indicating a 42.5% upside. The Indian e-commerce sector, while growing, faces economic challenges such as inflation and potentially higher interest rates, affecting spending on non-essentials and raising costs for growth companies. Quick commerce in India has drawn considerable investor interest, raising $586 million across verticals between January 2025 and March 2026, but questions remain about long-term viability and profit.

### Risks to Profitability Remain High

Achieving lasting profits for both companies faces many risks. For Zomato, the main worry is how Blinkit expands and if it can become profitable at scale without hurting margins through low prices or heavy promotions. The fierce competition in quick delivery means big spending to keep market share, possibly delaying profit. HDFC Securities notes a high P/E of 988.85 for Zomato and a risk of squeezed margins. For Swiggy, the large losses at Instamart are a major hurdle. The company must show a clear plan to cut these losses while also fighting off rivals like Zomato's Blinkit and other grocery delivery services. While Swiggy is expected to break even on per-order profit by Q1 FY27 for Instamart, adjusted losses are expected to narrow to nearly ₹4.2 billion by FY28. Regulatory reviews of platform fees, data privacy, and gig worker conditions could add costs and complexity. Furthermore, a slowdown in overall consumer spending due to economic factors could hit spending on non-essentials harder, impacting both order volumes and average order values. How well management handles these issues, balancing growth and profit, will be key.

### What's Next for India's Food Delivery Giants

Analysts are mostly optimistic about the long-term growth prospects for India's new-age tech players, as more people get online and use digital services. However, the immediate focus is on the path to profitability. Investments in quick commerce are expected to continue, but with more focus on efficiency and boosting margins. Zomato is expected to use its two-pronged growth approach, while Swiggy will need to tightly control costs and improve its quick delivery services to reach break-even. HDFC Securities forecasts Zomato's monthly users, order volumes, and order value to grow at 20%, 24%, and 18% year-on-year respectively, with Blinkit adding about 250 more delivery hubs. Nuvama has maintained a 'BUY' rating on Zomato with a target price of ₹300, noting that while Blinkit's expansion might delay near-term profit, it should lead to future gains. Investors are likely to favor companies with a clear plan for steady profits in a tough economy.

Get stock alerts instantly on WhatsApp

Quarterly results, bulk deals, concall updates and major announcements delivered in real time.

Disclaimer:This content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, or trading advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. Readers should consult a SEBI-registered advisor before making investment decisions, as markets involve risk and past performance does not guarantee future results. The publisher and authors accept no liability for any losses. Some content may be AI-generated and may contain errors; accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. Views expressed do not reflect the publication’s editorial stance.