India Expands Censorship Powers; X Corp. Challenges Ruling

TECH
Whalesbook Logo
AuthorRiya Kapoor|Published at:
India Expands Censorship Powers; X Corp. Challenges Ruling
Overview

India is granting new powers to its Ministry of Home Affairs to control online content via the Sahyog Portal. Tech companies like X Corp. are fighting these moves in court, arguing they bypass legal safeguards and weaken protections. A recent court ruling favored the government, but X Corp. plans an appeal. The situation also raises broader questions about data privacy and press freedom.

Instant Stock Alerts on WhatsApp

Used by 10,000+ active investors

1

Add Stocks

Select the stocks you want to track in real time.

2

Get Alerts on WhatsApp

Receive instant updates directly to WhatsApp.

  • Quarterly Results
  • Concall Announcements
  • New Orders & Big Deals
  • Capex Announcements
  • Bulk Deals
  • And much more

Government Expands Online Content Control

India's government is strengthening its oversight of online content. The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) now has expanded authority to order content takedowns from social media platforms through a newly established portal. This centralized system allows a wider range of government officials, including police, to issue removal orders, a power previously held by fewer ministries.

Tech Firms Challenge New Powers in Court

Major internet companies are pushing back against India's growing censorship measures. X Corp. has filed a lawsuit against the government's Sahyog Portal, arguing it creates a parallel system for content blocking. The company contends this bypasses the strict legal safeguards required by Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, and undermines the principles of online free speech upheld by a 2015 Supreme Court ruling.

Court Upholds Government Authority, Appeal Planned

Despite legal challenges, the Karnataka High Court largely supported the government's position in September 2025. The court stated platforms must take responsibility for content moderation, particularly concerning offenses against women. X Corp. has announced plans to appeal this decision. Meanwhile, amendments made in 2021 to the IT Act's intermediary guidelines have already reduced the legal "safe harbor" protections for online platforms under Section 79.

Data Privacy and Press Freedom Concerns Mount

The regulatory environment is further complicated by ongoing legal challenges to India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP Act) of 2023, which are being heard by the Supreme Court. Critics argue that the DPDP Act, coupled with recent amendments to the Right to Information (RTI) Act, could potentially suppress press freedom. These changes might require journalists to seek prior government permission before publishing sensitive information, which opponents fear could reduce accountability.

Scale of Takedown Requests and Transparency Issues

The volume of content removal requests is significant. X Corp. reported receiving approximately 29,118 requests in the first half of 2025, averaging about 160 per day. The Sahyog Portal is designed to facilitate this process, connecting various state and central government agencies, as well as companies. However, a lack of public data on these takedown requests and limited responses to Right to Information queries contribute to concerns about transparency surrounding these expanded government powers.

Get stock alerts instantly on WhatsApp

Quarterly results, bulk deals, concall updates and major announcements delivered in real time.

Disclaimer:This content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, or trading advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. Readers should consult a SEBI-registered advisor before making investment decisions, as markets involve risk and past performance does not guarantee future results. The publisher and authors accept no liability for any losses. Some content may be AI-generated and may contain errors; accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. Views expressed do not reflect the publication’s editorial stance.