### Regulatory Overhaul Targets ETF Price Discovery
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has initiated a significant recalibration of exchange-traded fund (ETF) trading protocols, aiming to bridge the persistent gap between market prices and underlying asset values. The core of the proposal involves migrating from the current T-2 day Net Asset Value (NAV) based system for determining price bands to a more current T-1 day framework. This strategic shift seeks to eliminate the inherent one-day lag, a factor that has increasingly demonstrated its inadequacy, particularly during periods of heightened market volatility. SEBI's move is a proactive response to observed inefficiencies, with market participants noting that the existing framework can lead to ETFs trading at excessive premiums or discounts to their true value, thereby impacting price discovery and potentially causing erroneous order entries or trading halts.
### Dynamic Bands and T-1 Pricing Options
SEBI is considering four potential methodologies for establishing the T-day base price: the T-1 day's closing traded price (weighted average of the last 30 minutes), the T-1 day's closing NAV (if available before market open), the average indicative NAV (iNAV) of the last 30 minutes on T-1, or the latest available T-1 iNAV. This flexibility aims to improve price discovery and reduce operational friction. The regulator is also proposing to replace the uniform ±20% fixed price band with a calibrated, dynamic mechanism. For equity and debt index-linked ETFs, an initial ±10% band is suggested, which can be expanded to ±20% under specific conditions, including cooling-off periods. This is informed by data showing that over 99.8% of such ETFs typically move less than 10% daily. Gold and silver ETFs will see an initial ±6% band, while overnight and TREPs ETFs will retain their ±5% band. SEBI is further exploring aligning commodity ETF bands with underlying derivative contract limits.
### The Analytical Deep Dive: Benchmarking and Context
This proposed shift aligns India's ETF pricing closer to global practices, where individual stocks in markets like the U.S. often use T-1 closing prices for price band determination. The Indian ETF market itself has seen substantial growth, with assets under management surpassing ₹10 lakh crore in 2025. Concurrently, India has been progressively moving towards a T+1 settlement cycle for all trades, a reform designed to enhance market efficiency and liquidity by shortening settlement periods to one day. This broader regulatory push towards faster and more integrated market operations provides a supportive backdrop for SEBI's ETF reforms. While international ETFs globally face unique price discovery challenges due to varying market hours and time zones, SEBI's focus on T-1 pricing and dynamic bands addresses India-specific lags and volatility concerns. The Indian equity market, as represented by the INDA ETF, had a P/E ratio of 23.72 as of February 12, 2026. The WisdomTree India Earnings Fund (EPI) had an expense ratio of 0.84% with $2.69 billion in assets under management as of February 12, 2026. The broader Indian ETF industry managed nearly ₹8.75 lakh crore by FY25, reflecting significant market depth.
### The Bear Case: Operational Hurdles and Volatility Risks
Despite SEBI's objective to reduce errors and improve efficiency, the transition is not without potential pitfalls. Exchanges have voiced practical concerns regarding the timely availability of T-1 iNAV data, as the Association of Mutual Funds in India (AMFI) publishes official NAVs with a delay. The proposed dynamic price bands, while intended to reflect volatility, could introduce added complexity for market participants and potentially lead to unintended consequences if not calibrated precisely. Recent events in late January 2026, where gold and silver ETFs experienced inadequate pricing alignment during high volatility, highlight the inherent challenges in managing price bands during extreme market swings. While SEBI aims to eliminate lag-induced errors, the implementation of manual adjustments on T-1 data could still present risks if not executed flawlessly. The move towards more dynamic bands also raises questions about how liquidity will be impacted, particularly during sharp market movements, as tighter, more responsive bands could, in theory, constrict trading activity if not managed correctly.
### Future Outlook
SEBI has opened the proposals for public comment until March 6, signaling a deliberative approach to finalizing these significant changes. The anticipated outcome is an Indian ETF market that operates with greater accuracy, reduced tracking errors, and improved liquidity, making it a more attractive investment vehicle for a broader investor base. The regulator's comprehensive review of ETF trading mechanisms underscores a commitment to modernizing market infrastructure and enhancing investor confidence amidst a growing and dynamic market.