Why Mutual Fund NAV Is Not the Same as Share Price

OTHER
Whalesbook Logo
AuthorAnanya Iyer|Published at:
Why Mutual Fund NAV Is Not the Same as Share Price

Many investors wrongly believe a lower Net Asset Value (NAV) makes a mutual fund cheaper. In reality, NAV is just the per-unit value of a fund's assets and does not indicate if a fund is undervalued or better performing. Smart investors should focus on consistent long-term returns and expense ratios instead of price tags.

Detailed Coverage

A common mistake among many new investors in the Indian market is the belief that a mutual fund with a lower Net Asset Value (NAV) is a better or 'cheaper' buy. This way of thinking often comes from our daily shopping habits, where we prefer items with lower price tags. However, when it comes to mutual funds, this logic does not apply. Comparing the NAV of two different mutual funds is like comparing apples and oranges, as it tells you nothing about the quality of the investment.

What NAV Actually Measures

NAV represents the market value of all the securities held in a fund's portfolio, minus its liabilities, divided by the number of units held by investors. Essentially, it is just a reflection of the current value of the assets the fund owns per unit. Unlike a stock price, which changes based on market demand and supply or company fundamentals, the NAV is simply an accounting measure. A fund starting today at an NAV of ₹10 will eventually reach the same value as an older fund with an NAV of ₹100 if both funds earn the same percentage return on their underlying investments.

Why Price Tags Mislead Investors

Investors who chase funds with lower NAVs often ignore the most important factors for wealth creation. If two funds invest in the same companies or sectors and achieve identical returns, the total value of your investment will grow by the same percentage, regardless of whether you started with an NAV of ₹20 or ₹200. A fund with a higher NAV may actually be a better choice if it has a proven track record, better management, and a lower expense ratio, which is the annual fee charged by the fund house to manage your money.

Better Metrics for Selecting Funds

Rather than looking at the NAV, investors should evaluate the consistency of a fund's performance over long periods, such as five, seven, or ten years. It is important to see how the fund has performed during both market rallies and market declines compared to its benchmark index. Furthermore, look at the expense ratio; a lower expense ratio means more of your money stays invested and can grow over time. Always check the fund manager’s track record and the strategy the fund follows to ensure it matches your personal financial goals. Ultimately, the quality of the stocks or bonds within the portfolio matters far more than the current unit price.
Disclaimer: This article is published for informational purposes only. This is not a buy sell recommendation.