Delhi High Court Orders Security Review for Ranveer Singh's 'Dhurandhar 2'

MEDIA-AND-ENTERTAINMENT
Whalesbook Logo
AuthorKavya Nair|Published at:
Delhi High Court Orders Security Review for Ranveer Singh's 'Dhurandhar 2'
Overview

The Delhi High Court has ordered a security review for Ranveer Singh's upcoming film 'Dhurandhar 2'. This follows allegations that the movie might have leaked sensitive information about the Indian armed forces and DRDO drug development, potentially violating the Official Secrets Act and impacting national security. The court stressed that even fictional content can have serious security implications.

Instant Stock Alerts on WhatsApp

Used by 10,000+ active investors

1

Add Stocks

Select the stocks you want to track in real time.

2

Get Alerts on WhatsApp

Receive instant updates directly to WhatsApp.

  • Quarterly Results
  • Concall Announcements
  • New Orders & Big Deals
  • Capex Announcements
  • Bulk Deals
  • And much more

Security Review for 'Dhurandhar 2' Ordered by Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has directed the Union government and the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) to thoroughly review claims that the film 'Dhurandhar 2' may have jeopardized national security. A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) raised concerns that the movie, reportedly starring Ranveer Singh, could expose sensitive operational details of the Indian armed forces and information related to Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) drug development. The court acknowledged the potential impact, stating that even fictional portrayals require careful examination.

Balancing Artistry and National Security

A Division Bench, led by Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia, recognized the petitioner's concerns. They emphasized that the influence of any film, regardless of its fictional nature, is significant. The court's decision reflects an increasing awareness of the need to balance creative freedom with national security imperatives. The allegations include the potential disclosure of classified DRDO research on new drugs, adding another dimension to the security review.

Regulatory Action and Precedent

The court instructed the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB) and the CBFC to consider the PIL as a formal representation and issue a reasoned decision. This case highlights the importance of strong guidelines for the CBFC to handle content that could affect national security. Authorities are tasked with determining if the film's narrative, even if fictionalized, violates the Official Secrets Act or presents other security risks. The court's directive sets a precedent for scrutinizing entertainment content with potential national security implications.

Get stock alerts instantly on WhatsApp

Quarterly results, bulk deals, concall updates and major announcements delivered in real time.

Disclaimer:This content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, or trading advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. Readers should consult a SEBI-registered advisor before making investment decisions, as markets involve risk and past performance does not guarantee future results. The publisher and authors accept no liability for any losses. Some content may be AI-generated and may contain errors; accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. Views expressed do not reflect the publication’s editorial stance.