Delhi High Court Denies Ilaiyaraaja Copyright in Iconic Song

MEDIA-AND-ENTERTAINMENT
Whalesbook Logo
AuthorKavya Nair|Published at:
Delhi High Court Denies Ilaiyaraaja Copyright in Iconic Song
Overview

The Delhi High Court has ruled that music composer Ilaiyaraaja does not own the copyright to the lyrics or sound recording of 'En Iniya Pon Nilave.' The court upheld a prior order, dismissing Ilaiyaraaja's appeal against Saregama India Limited regarding the song's recreation. Rights were assigned to Saregama by the film producer.

Instant Stock Alerts on WhatsApp

Used by 10,000+ active investors

1

Add Stocks

Select the stocks you want to track in real time.

2

Get Alerts on WhatsApp

Receive instant updates directly to WhatsApp.

  • Quarterly Results
  • Concall Announcements
  • New Orders & Big Deals
  • Capex Announcements
  • Bulk Deals
  • And much more

Copyright Dispute Over "En Iniya Pon Nilave" Resolved

The Delhi High Court has dismissed music composer Ilaiyaraaja's appeal concerning the copyright of the Tamil song "En Iniya Pon Nilave." A Division Bench affirmed that Ilaiyaraaja holds no copyright over the lyrics or the sound recording of the iconic track. This ruling clarifies that under the Copyright Act, a "musical work" pertains solely to the musical composition, excluding lyrics and sound recordings.

Producer's Assignment to Saregama Upheld

The court recognized that the copyright for the film "Moodu Pani," which featured the original song, vested with the producer, Raja Cine Arts. This producer had previously assigned all rights to Saregama India Limited, a fact central to the legal dispute. Saregama initiated legal action in January 2025 against Vels Films International when they planned to use a recreated version of the song in the film "Aghathiyaa."

Vels Films claimed they had obtained a license from Ilaiyaraaja for the adaptation. However, a single judge bench had previously rejected this, finding a strong argument for Saregama's ownership based on the producer's assignment. The single judge also highlighted that Ilaiyaraaja was not the lyricist, thus he could not assign rights for the lyrical content.

Impact on Music Rights and Royalties

This decision reinforces the principle that copyright ownership in films extends to accompanying sound recordings and is typically held by the producer. The court’s interpretation of Section 2(p) of the Copyright Act, which defines a "musical work," signifies a critical distinction between composition and derivative elements like lyrics and recorded performances. This could impact future royalty distributions and licensing negotiations for re-recordings and adaptations in the Indian music industry. Saregama's assertion of ownership over the sound recordings and literary works from "Moodu Pani," based on a 1980 agreement, has been validated. The outcome means that any future use of the original sound recording or lyrics would require Saregama's consent, potentially leading to new licensing agreements and revenue streams for the music label. This decision underscores the importance of clear contractual assignments in film and music production.

Get stock alerts instantly on WhatsApp

Quarterly results, bulk deals, concall updates and major announcements delivered in real time.

Disclaimer:This content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, or trading advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. Readers should consult a SEBI-registered advisor before making investment decisions, as markets involve risk and past performance does not guarantee future results. The publisher and authors accept no liability for any losses. Some content may be AI-generated and may contain errors; accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. Views expressed do not reflect the publication’s editorial stance.