The family of American national Matthew VanDyke is urging the US government to intervene in his ongoing detention at Tihar Jail. Held since March 2026 on charges under India's UAPA, VanDyke faces accusations of providing training to insurgent groups. His legal team cites failing health as they push for a resolution in a case that is becoming a complex diplomatic test for both nations.
The family of American security analyst Matthew VanDyke has increased pressure on the US State Department to intervene in his ongoing detention at Tihar Jail in New Delhi. VanDyke, the founder of Sons of Liberty International, has been in custody since his arrest on March 13, 2026, at Kolkata airport. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) has charged him with conspiracy under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), alleging he provided weapons and drone technology training to insurgent groups active in India’s Northeast.
VanDyke’s legal representatives and family have raised significant concerns regarding his health while in jail. They have reported issues such as severe weight loss and mobility challenges, leading to requests for a transfer to private medical facilities for specialized care. While some dietary adjustments have been permitted by the court, pleas for transfer to private healthcare have so far been declined. His judicial custody was recently extended, and his next court appearance is scheduled for September 8, 2026.
The case has drawn attention within US diplomatic circles. Reports confirm that family representatives have been in active communication with officials, including US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and US Ambassador to India Sergio Gor, to seek a diplomatic resolution. The matter presents a delicate challenge, as Indian authorities continue to proceed with investigations under strict anti-terror laws, while his supporters maintain that his detention requires higher-level diplomatic oversight.
The situation remains a significant point of scrutiny for observers of India-US relations. The next steps will depend on the upcoming court hearings and whether diplomatic channels can address the humanitarian concerns raised by his legal team without interfering with the ongoing NIA investigation into the alleged support for insurgent activities.