The Supreme Court will hear two new petitions regarding alleged police misconduct during the July 20 student protests in Delhi. The court process will evaluate claims of excessive force, while the CRPF is investigating reports of injuries. These legal developments follow ongoing scrutiny in the Delhi High Court concerning police conduct and internet restrictions near protest sites.
Detailed Coverage
The Supreme Court of India is set to hear two petitions addressing alleged police misconduct during the student demonstrations that occurred in the capital on July 20. These filings come as public and legal scrutiny intensifies regarding the use of force during recent protests.
Court Clarification and Legal Proceedings
Chief Justice of India Surya Kant addressed the matter in court, clarifying that no formal petition had been filed prior to the current submissions. The Chief Justice also expressed disapproval of certain media reports that had claimed the court had previously refused to hear the case, noting that only a lawyer's representation had been received until now. Senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, appearing for the petitioners, has requested an urgent listing of these matters, highlighting concerns regarding the alleged use of excessive force against demonstrators.
Ongoing Investigations and Evidence Collection
The Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) has confirmed that it is currently verifying reports concerning injuries sustained by protesters, including allegations that pellet guns were used by Rapid Action Force (RAF) personnel. The Delhi Police have previously issued denials regarding the use of such equipment against protesters. Simultaneously, the Cockroach Janta Party has announced the launch of a digital archive intended to document evidence of police conduct to support potential legal actions, including the filing of First Information Reports (FIRs).
Parallel Legal Scrutiny in Delhi
Beyond the Supreme Court, the Delhi High Court is actively hearing multiple petitions related to the same July 20 event. The High Court has directed the government and the Delhi Police to provide responses to the allegations. Additionally, it has issued orders for the preservation of all relevant evidence, including video recordings of the incident. The High Court is also examining a separate challenge regarding the suspension of internet services in the vicinity of Jantar Mantar, which authorities implemented citing public safety.
Administrative Actions
Internal administrative steps have also been reported following the circulation of videos showing police personnel in confrontational roles. Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police (ADCP) Sandeep Lamba has been reassigned from protest-related duties following the emergence of footage alleging his involvement in an incident involving a protester. Other video materials showing uniformed officials engaged in alleged assault and misconduct are also part of the broader inquiry. Investors and observers will track the upcoming Supreme Court hearing to understand the potential judicial guidelines that may emerge regarding police conduct during public demonstrations and the application of powers under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS).