The Supreme Court has raised concerns over introducing a third language in Class 9, citing unnecessary academic stress ahead of board exams. The court recommended that language learning begin as early as Class 6 and clarified that the National Education Policy does not mandate Hindi as a compulsory third language.
The Supreme Court on Thursday examined the current policy regarding the introduction of a third language in the 9th standard for students under the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) curriculum. During the proceedings, Justice B.V. Nagarathna highlighted that forcing students to begin a new language so close to their board examinations creates avoidable pressure.
Early Language Learning Recommendations
Justice Nagarathna suggested that education authorities should shift the focus toward introducing a third language much earlier in a student's academic journey. The court noted that Class 6 or Class 8 would be more appropriate stages for such additions, allowing students sufficient time to adapt without the added anxiety of approaching board exams. The Bench expressed a need for education boards, including CBSE, ICSE, and various State Boards, to review their policies to align with this approach of reducing student stress.
Clarification on National Education Policy
Addressing confusion regarding the implementation of language policies, the Supreme Court clarified that the National Education Policy (NEP) does not designate Hindi as the mandatory third language. The court reiterated that the policy framework envisions the teaching of the state language, English, and a third language of choice, without specifically imposing Hindi.
This legal observation is particularly relevant as the court continues to examine broader educational policies across different states. The court also encouraged the Tamil Nadu government to engage more collaboratively with central government educational frameworks, specifically regarding the ongoing discussions on the establishment of Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas within the state.
The matter has been adjourned until August 11, when the court is expected to continue its review of these educational policy issues and their implementation across the country.