Law/Court
|
Updated on 13 Nov 2025, 02:16 pm
Reviewed By
Simar Singh | Whalesbook News Team
A significant legal battle is unfolding in the Delhi High Court, where Indian law firm CMS IndusLaw, along with its partners, is challenging the Bar Council of India (BCI) Rules that allow foreign law firms and lawyers entry into India. The Rules, notified in March 2023 and amended in May 2025, are being contested on grounds that the BCI exceeded its powers under the Advocates Act, 1961, and violated constitutional provisions.
Petitioners argue that Section 49 of the Advocates Act does not grant the BCI the authority to regulate foreign legal practice. They claim the BCI Rules are 'ultra vires' the parent Act, as they deem foreign lawyers as advocates without requiring enrollment with State Bar Councils, thereby diluting a mandatory requirement. Furthermore, the plea highlights that the gazette notification of these Rules does not indicate approval from the Chief Justice of India (CJI) or the Central Government, which are statutory mandates for such rules to have legal force.
CMS IndusLaw also challenged a show cause notice issued by the BCI regarding alleged unauthorized collaborations. The High Court, after hearing arguments, questioned the BCI's rules, particularly concerning severe penalties like suspending registration based on preliminary inquiries. The Court has ordered the BCI to defer its proceedings against CMS IndusLaw and requested clarification on whether the Rules received the necessary CJI and Central Government approvals.
Impact: This legal challenge could profoundly reshape the regulatory landscape for foreign law firms in India. A favorable ruling for CMS IndusLaw might restrict or significantly alter foreign law firm operations, potentially protecting the domestic market but impacting foreign investment and legal service accessibility. Conversely, upholding the BCI rules could pave the way for increased international competition and collaboration in India's legal sector. Rating: 7/10.