Delhi High Court Denies Patent for Worm-Based Cancer Detection Method

LAWCOURT
Whalesbook Logo
AuthorKavya Nair|Published at:
Delhi High Court Denies Patent for Worm-Based Cancer Detection Method
Overview

The Delhi High Court has rejected a patent plea from Japanese firm Hirotsu Bio Science Inc. The application sought to patent a cancer detection method using a worm's response to human biological samples. Justice Tejas Karia upheld the patent office's decision, ruling the invention falls under Section 3(i) of the Indian Patents Act, which prohibits patenting diagnostic methods for diseases.

Instant Stock Alerts on WhatsApp

Used by 10,000+ active investors

1

Add Stocks

Select the stocks you want to track in real time.

2

Get Alerts on WhatsApp

Receive instant updates directly to WhatsApp.

  • Quarterly Results
  • Concall Announcements
  • New Orders & Big Deals
  • Capex Announcements
  • Bulk Deals
  • And much more

Upholding the patent office's August 2023 order, the Delhi High Court has definitively rejected a patent application by Japanese firm Hirotsu Bio Science Inc. The company sought exclusive rights for an "in vitro method for detecting cancer" that leverages the behavior of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, which are reportedly attracted to cancer-specific odors in samples like urine.

Legal Rationale

Justice Tejas Karia's ruling emphasized Section 3(i) of the Indian Patents Act. This section explicitly excludes methods used to diagnose, prevent, or treat diseases in humans or animals from being patentable. The court reasoned that the process claimed was a general diagnostic method for cancer, not merely a preliminary screening tool as the company had argued.

The firm contended that its technique operated entirely outside the human body and did not involve clinical judgment, differentiating it from non-patentable medical diagnoses. However, the court dismissed this distinction, stating it is immaterial who performs the method. The ruling clarifies that autonomous diagnostic methods are also subject to the prohibition under Section 3(i).

This decision reinforces India's stance on the patentability of medical diagnostic procedures and sets a precedent for similar applications in the future. Advocates Kshitij Saxena, Saransh Vijayvargiya, and Daksh Oberoi represented Hirotsu Bio Science, while Advocates Manisha Agarwal and Nipun Jain appeared for the Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs.

Get stock alerts instantly on WhatsApp

Quarterly results, bulk deals, concall updates and major announcements delivered in real time.

Disclaimer:This content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, or trading advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. Readers should consult a SEBI-registered advisor before making investment decisions, as markets involve risk and past performance does not guarantee future results. The publisher and authors accept no liability for any losses. Some content may be AI-generated and may contain errors; accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. Views expressed do not reflect the publication’s editorial stance.