Calcutta High Court Orders Action Against Online Attacks on Judges

LAWCOURT
Whalesbook Logo
AuthorVihaan Mehta|Published at:
Calcutta High Court Orders Action Against Online Attacks on Judges
Overview

The Calcutta High Court has ordered the West Bengal Director General of Police to create a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) to counter online defamation of judges. This directive was prompted by a YouTube video that allegedly made baseless claims against the court's handling of a case involving a prominent Hindu monk and rape charges. The court aims to protect its integrity from what it calls 'contumacious outbursts'.

Instant Stock Alerts on WhatsApp

Used by 10,000+ active investors

1

Add Stocks

Select the stocks you want to track in real time.

2

Get Alerts on WhatsApp

Receive instant updates directly to WhatsApp.

  • Quarterly Results
  • Concall Announcements
  • New Orders & Big Deals
  • Capex Announcements
  • Bulk Deals
  • And much more

Judicial Integrity Under Scrutiny

The Calcutta High Court has taken a decisive step to safeguard its judges from online attacks, ordering the West Bengal Director General of Police to establish a concrete Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). This action, issued on May 21st, follows the court's observation of a YouTube video that, according to Justice Jay Sengupta, contained "wanton aspersions" against the judiciary. The proceedings under scrutiny involved a petition to quash rape charges against Swami Pradiptananda, a figure also known as Kartik Maharaj and a recipient of the Padma Shri award.

Protecting Against 'Contumacious Outbursts'

The court voiced significant concern over imputations and what it described as "defamatory and contumacious outbursts" targeting judges, even when the court was not in session. These incidents, along with other "very disturbing" videos, have prompted the court to seek a formal mechanism to address such alleged defamation and protect the sanctity of judicial proceedings. The move aims to preemptively address attempts to undermine judicial impartiality through social media.

The Underlying Rape Allegations

The case prompting this judicial directive involves serious allegations dating back to 2013. The complainant asserts that Swami Pradiptananda repeatedly raped her after promising her a teaching position at a school affiliated with the Bharat Sevashram Sangha. The victim has further accused him of forced abortion and criminal intimidation. Swami Pradiptananda's petition denies these accusations, asserting he has been targeted by political forces within the state government.

Legal Proceedings and Future Dates

Previously, Swami Pradiptananda had requested in-camera proceedings, citing videos that he believed targeted both himself and the judges presiding over his case. The High Court has set June 22nd as the date for the next hearing in this matter, where further developments regarding the SOP and the underlying allegations are anticipated.

Get stock alerts instantly on WhatsApp

Quarterly results, bulk deals, concall updates and major announcements delivered in real time.

Disclaimer:This content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, or trading advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. Readers should consult a SEBI-registered advisor before making investment decisions, as markets involve risk and past performance does not guarantee future results. The publisher and authors accept no liability for any losses. Some content may be AI-generated and may contain errors; accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. Views expressed do not reflect the publication’s editorial stance.