Calcutta HC Halts Police Action Against Abhishek Banerjee Until July 31

LAWCOURT
Whalesbook Logo
AuthorRiya Kapoor|Published at:
Calcutta HC Halts Police Action Against Abhishek Banerjee Until July 31
Overview

The Calcutta High Court has temporarily stopped West Bengal Police from taking coercive action against Trinamool Congress MP Abhishek Banerjee until July 31. This relief is granted if he cooperates with the investigation into his "godfather from Delhi" remarks about Union Home Minister Amit Shah. The court noted the inflammatory language and the state's history of post-poll violence.

Instant Stock Alerts on WhatsApp

Used by 10,000+ active investors

1

Add Stocks

Select the stocks you want to track in real time.

2

Get Alerts on WhatsApp

Receive instant updates directly to WhatsApp.

  • Quarterly Results
  • Concall Announcements
  • New Orders & Big Deals
  • Capex Announcements
  • Bulk Deals
  • And much more

The Calcutta High Court has issued an interim order preventing West Bengal Police from taking coercive measures against Trinamool Congress MP Abhishek Banerjee. This protection is active until July 31 and depends on Banerjee's full cooperation with the investigation into his recent remarks made during election rallies. Justice Saugata Bhattacharyya's bench stated that any failure to cooperate would allow state respondents to seek further court intervention. Banerjee is also now required to get court permission for overseas travel and must receive at least 48 hours' notice for any police summons.

This interim order stems from Banerjee's request to dismiss a criminal case filed over his election speeches, particularly a statement on April 7 where he allegedly called Union Home Minister Amit Shah a "godfather from Delhi." The court strongly disapproved of such language, calling it "uncalled for" and questioning its necessity given Banerjee's role as a Member of Parliament and the state's volatile political history. The judge remarked that these statements "strike the conscience of the court." Banerjee's legal team argued the case was politically motivated and lacked proof of direct violence.

However, the court referenced the state's "political history" and potential consequences if election results had been different. The state government initially opposed the interim protection, arguing existing legal processes were adequate. Nonetheless, opposing counsel asserted that violence had indeed followed Banerjee's comments, adding complexity to the discussion on his rhetoric's impact.

Get stock alerts instantly on WhatsApp

Quarterly results, bulk deals, concall updates and major announcements delivered in real time.

Disclaimer:This content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, or trading advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. Readers should consult a SEBI-registered advisor before making investment decisions, as markets involve risk and past performance does not guarantee future results. The publisher and authors accept no liability for any losses. Some content may be AI-generated and may contain errors; accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. Views expressed do not reflect the publication’s editorial stance.