The CBI has confirmed that no evidence links Sanjeev Mukhiya to the NEET-UG 2024 paper leak conspiracy. While the agency has filed chargesheets against 45 others involved in the case, Mukhiya was excluded from these filings due to a lack of incriminating proof. He remains in judicial custody regarding separate, unrelated legal matters.
Detailed Coverage
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has officially stated that its investigation into the NEET-UG 2024 examination paper theft has found no evidence connecting Sanjeev Kumar, widely known as Sanjeev Mukhiya, to the incident. This conclusion follows an extensive probe by the federal agency, which has now moved to hold the actual perpetrators accountable.
Investigation Findings and Chargesheets
After taking over the case, the CBI conducted a thorough examination to map out the entire conspiracy. The agency successfully traced the theft and distribution network of the examination papers. As a result of this investigation, the CBI has filed chargesheets against 45 individuals before a court in Patna. These charges cover those involved in the original theft, the distribution chain, and individuals identified as beneficiaries of the leaked materials.
Clarifying Initial Suspicions
The initial FIR filed by the Bihar Police, which first uncovered the paper theft, had named Mukhiya as an accused. This inclusion was based largely on his history regarding other investigations into examination leaks. Following the transfer of the case to the CBI, Mukhiya was taken into custody for questioning. However, the agency reported that its independent evidence collection did not substantiate the initial allegations concerning the NEET-UG 2024 incident.
Current Legal Status
Although he was named in the initial FIR and spent time in custody during the investigation, the CBI has not filed any charges against Mukhiya in this specific case. It is important to note that while he has been granted bail in the NEET-UG 2024 matter, he remains in judicial custody due to pending proceedings in separate, unrelated cases. The conclusion of this investigation provides clarity on his involvement in the high-profile paper leak case, effectively separating it from his other legal challenges.