India's Patent Law in Spotlight Over SMA Drug Access

HEALTHCAREBIOTECH
Whalesbook Logo
AuthorKavya Nair|Published at:
India's Patent Law in Spotlight Over SMA Drug Access
Overview

The astronomical cost of Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) treatments remains a significant barrier in India, despite Natco Pharma's efforts to produce a more affordable version of Evrysdi. Patients are now turning to patent law, specifically Section 100 of the Patents Act, 1970, as courts weigh the adequacy of government aid caps against the right to life.

Instant Stock Alerts on WhatsApp

Used by 10,000+ active investors

1

Add Stocks

Select the stocks you want to track in real time.

2

Get Alerts on WhatsApp

Receive instant updates directly to WhatsApp.

  • Quarterly Results
  • Concall Announcements
  • New Orders & Big Deals
  • Capex Announcements
  • Bulk Deals
  • And much more

1. THE SEAMLESS LINK

This legal and financial deadlock highlights a broader struggle within India's healthcare system: balancing intellectual property rights with the fundamental right to life when faced with life-threatening, high-cost rare diseases. The government's National Rare Diseases Policy, 2021, offers limited financial support, creating a critical gap that patient advocacy groups are attempting to bridge through the courts.

Patent Law Under Scrutiny

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA), a debilitating inherited neuromuscular condition, presents a stark case of treatment inaccessibility due to exorbitant costs. While gene therapy can exceed ₹17 crore, the oral solution Evrysdi, previously a primary medical recourse, carried an annual price tag of ₹72 lakh. Even with the introduction of the National Rare Diseases Policy (NRDP), 2021, the policy's ₹50 lakh one-time financial support is insufficient for many patients requiring ongoing, costly therapies. This policy, along with designated Centres of Excellence, has struggled to adequately address the financial burden of rare diseases, particularly those categorized under Group 3.

Natco's Intervention and Persistent Gaps

Natco Pharma has emerged as a key player in the domestic market by manufacturing a molecule similar to Evrysdi, dramatically reducing the cost to approximately ₹15,000 per vial. This brings the estimated annual treatment cost down to around ₹5 lakh. However, this figure, while significantly lower, still remains prohibitive for a substantial portion of the population. Furthermore, the Centers of Excellence are reportedly not yet consistently prescribing the more affordable generic versions, suggesting systemic inertia that impedes broader access. The limited efficacy of the NRDP's ₹50 lakh cap means that even with Natco's contribution, long-term or comprehensive treatment remains a significant financial challenge.

Legal Avenues Explored

In response to these systemic failures, patients and advocacy groups are increasingly leveraging legal channels. Seba, a 24-year-old SMA patient, exemplifies this push by seeking the invocation of Section 100 of the Patent Act, 1970. This seldom-used provision grants the government the power to utilize patented inventions for non-commercial public use, a safeguard enacted to prevent patent monopolies from obstructing access to essential medicines. This legal mechanism, designed to address public health emergencies, has historically been bypassed by Indian governments. Seba's case, joined by others, is now before the Supreme Court, questioning the constitutionality of the ₹50 lakh funding ceiling and arguing that the government's inaction constitutes a violation of the fundamental right to life under Article 21.

The Supreme Court's Role

The Supreme Court faces a critical juncture, tasked with adjudicating the adequacy of the ₹50 lakh cap on government assistance for rare diseases. The apex court's decision will not only impact the immediate cases before it but could also set a significant precedent for access to life-saving treatments in India. The court is expected to determine whether the government can be compelled to utilize provisions like Section 100 of the Patent Act to ensure affordable access to medicines, potentially influencing future government allocations towards research and indigenous manufacturing of critical drugs. Recent Supreme Court proceedings have included stays on High Court orders mandating drug provision beyond the ₹50 lakh cap, while also acknowledging the potential for case-by-case expenditure approvals and the cost-saving measures seen in other countries.

Market Context and Outlook

Natco Pharma, a vertically integrated pharmaceutical company focused on niche therapeutic areas, holds a market capitalization of approximately ₹14,554 crore as of late January 2026. Its Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio hovers around 9.46-10.36, indicating investor confidence in its earnings. The company's stock experienced fluctuations in late January 2026, trading within a range of roughly ₹813 to ₹946, reflecting market dynamics and ongoing news related to drug pricing and regulatory challenges. The broader Indian pharmaceutical sector is a global leader in generic drug production, yet faces considerable hurdles in developing and pricing orphan drugs for rare diseases due to high R&D costs and small patient populations. The evolving legal landscape, coupled with government policies like the NRDP and the newly established National Fund for Rare Diseases, will continue to shape the investment narrative for companies operating in this critical, albeit challenging, segment of the healthcare market.

Get stock alerts instantly on WhatsApp

Quarterly results, bulk deals, concall updates and major announcements delivered in real time.

Disclaimer:This content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, or trading advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. Readers should consult a SEBI-registered advisor before making investment decisions, as markets involve risk and past performance does not guarantee future results. The publisher and authors accept no liability for any losses. Some content may be AI-generated and may contain errors; accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. Views expressed do not reflect the publication’s editorial stance.