India's Passive Investing Booms: AUM Nears ₹15 Lakh Crore, Active Funds Face Pressure

ECONOMY
Whalesbook Logo
AuthorVihaan Mehta|Published at:
India's Passive Investing Booms: AUM Nears ₹15 Lakh Crore, Active Funds Face Pressure
Overview

Passive investing in India has seen explosive growth, with Assets Under Management (AUM) nearing ₹14-15 lakh crore by late 2025, making up 18% of the mutual fund industry. This is an almost 18-fold jump from less than ₹1 lakh crore in 2018. Investors are choosing low-cost, clear passive options, which also cover more than just basic index tracking. While these funds make markets more accessible, issues like crowded indexes, distorted valuations, and less flexibility in shaky markets are growing. At the same time, active fund managers are under more pressure as many large-cap equity funds fail to beat their benchmarks, especially after fees.

Instant Stock Alerts on WhatsApp

Used by 10,000+ active investors

1

Add Stocks

Select the stocks you want to track in real time.

2

Get Alerts on WhatsApp

Receive instant updates directly to WhatsApp.

  • Quarterly Results
  • Concall Announcements
  • New Orders & Big Deals
  • Capex Announcements
  • Bulk Deals
  • And much more

India's Passive Investing Booms

India's investment scene has changed significantly. Passive funds have moved from a niche option to a core part of many portfolios. Assets Under Management (AUM) in passive funds have soared, reaching an estimated ₹14-15 lakh crore by the end of 2025. This is an extraordinary surge, an almost 18-fold increase from less than ₹1 lakh crore recorded in 2018. Passive funds now account for about 18% of India's total mutual fund AUM, which reached approximately ₹80-81 lakh crore by late 2025. This strong growth follows global trends, where passive strategies have increasingly replaced active management, especially in developed markets.

Diversifying Beyond Basic Indexes

The growth of passive investing in India isn't just about tracking big market indexes like the NIFTY 50 or BSE SENSEX. Investor interest has broadened significantly, expanding into a wider array of passive products. Demand has grown for strategies tracking specific sectors, strategies based on factors like momentum, quality, and low volatility, and thematic investments. Commodity ETFs, particularly for gold and silver, have also seen substantial inflows, further broadening passive investing beyond equities. This diversification shows a maturing investor base looking for targeted market exposure and tailored portfolio tools, moving beyond simple large-cap choices.

Active Managers Face Growing Pressure

The rise of passive funds directly challenges traditional active fund management. Active equity funds, especially large-cap ones, have consistently found it hard to beat their benchmarks after deducting fees. Data from 2025 shows that about 65-66% of active large-cap funds failed to beat their respective indexes. This ongoing underperformance, made worse by active funds' higher costs (expense ratios often 1% to 2.5% yearly) compared to passive funds (0.05% to 0.5%), puts active managers under significant pressure to prove their value. While active funds might still offer an edge in less efficient areas like mid-caps, small-caps, or specific themes, the cost advantage and steady market tracking of passive options are compelling for many investors.

Risks to Consider with Passive Funds

However, passive strategies have built-in risks that investors need to be aware of. Market-cap weighted indexes, common in passive funds, can mean holding too much of overvalued stocks, especially at market highs, which raises the risk of losses during downturns. Because passive funds follow strict rules, they lack flexibility. They must buy or sell stocks during index changes even if the price isn't ideal, which can distort how prices are set and lead to mispriced assets. Passive funds are also directly exposed to market swings; they will fall along with the index during downturns, offering no buffer against broader market risk. Issues like index tracking errors and potential liquidity risks in less traded underlying securities also remain, along with the basic limitation of only matching market returns without generating extra gains (alpha).

Investor and Distributor Adoption

About 76% of retail investors are now familiar with index funds or ETFs, showing a big jump in awareness. Around 68% of investors held at least one passive fund in 2025, drawn by low costs, diversification, simplicity, and transparency. Distributors have also adopted passive strategies, with many understanding their usefulness and including them in client portfolios. They often plan to increase these allocations. Long-term investment goals, such as achieving financial independence and retirement planning, are primary drivers for adopting passive funds.

The Path Forward for Passive Investing

Analysts expect passive investing in India to keep growing, supported by ongoing digitalization, better financial understanding, and a preference for cost-effective, clear investment options. While market share is expected to rise, more complex passive products like factor and thematic ETFs signal a move toward more advanced passive options. The key challenge is understanding the specific risks of different index methods, like foreign ownership rules for MSCI indexes, and making sure passive strategies fit long-term goals.

Get stock alerts instantly on WhatsApp

Quarterly results, bulk deals, concall updates and major announcements delivered in real time.

Disclaimer:This content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, or trading advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. Readers should consult a SEBI-registered advisor before making investment decisions, as markets involve risk and past performance does not guarantee future results. The publisher and authors accept no liability for any losses. Some content may be AI-generated and may contain errors; accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. Views expressed do not reflect the publication’s editorial stance.