Indian investors moving into global markets via ETFs face major challenges, including high premiums over NAV and liquidity freezes caused by regulatory investment caps. These constraints limit the ability to trade units, making it difficult for investors to enter or exit positions when demand is high.
Indian investors seeking to diversify their portfolios through international Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are encountering significant operational hurdles. While the appeal of global markets, particularly the US tech sector, has grown, the mechanism for Indian retail participation remains constrained by strict regulatory limits set by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).
Impact of Regulatory Caps on Liquidity
The total industry-wide cap for overseas investments stands at $7 billion, with an individual limit of $1 billion for fund-of-funds managed by a single Asset Management Company (AMC). When an AMC reaches this limit, it can no longer issue new units. This creates a supply-demand imbalance in the secondary market. Because the supply of units is fixed, the price on the exchange can decouple from the fund's actual value. Investors may find themselves unable to sell their holdings when they want to exit, as the lack of new unit creation reduces market liquidity. In some instances, these funds experience days with minimal trading volume, where the stock price remains unchanged despite movements in the underlying foreign index.
Premium Pricing and Hidden Costs
High demand for global exposure has led to some ETFs trading at substantial premiums, sometimes reaching 15% or more above their indicative Net Asset Value (iNAV). Investors paying this markup are effectively purchasing the underlying assets at a cost far higher than their current market worth. Beyond the premium, investors must account for the broader cost structure of global investing. For those using the Liberalised Remittance Scheme (LRS) to invest directly, the process involves multiple layers of expenses. These include foreign exchange conversion charges, brokerage fees, account maintenance costs, and complex tax implications in both India and the foreign jurisdiction.
Challenges of the LRS Route
While GIFT City has been promoted as a pathway for global investment, the LRS route requires investors to manage the full cycle of converting Indian Rupees to foreign currency and back. This process is sensitive to currency fluctuations and requires careful tax planning. Because the Reserve Bank of India manages these limits to stabilize the rupee, investors should not expect a sudden easing of these caps. The complexity of regulatory reporting and the risk of paying inflated prices for global assets make thorough research essential. Investors looking to add global exposure should focus on understanding the specific liquidity status of the ETF before investing, as the inability to sell units during market stress remains a primary concern for those holding these products.
