India Replaces MGNREGA with New Act Amid Rights Erosion Fears

ECONOMY
Whalesbook Logo
AuthorKavya Nair|Published at:
India Replaces MGNREGA with New Act Amid Rights Erosion Fears
Overview

India has replaced the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) with the Viksit Bharat-Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Act, 2025. While the government hails it as a reform to fix structural gaps, critics decry it as a dismantling of a rights-based entitlement, raising concerns over the guaranteed 100 days of work and the law's hasty passage without state consultation.

New Rural Employment Act Replaces MGNREGA

The long-standing Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) of 2005 has been superseded by the Viksit Bharat-Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Act, 2025 (VB-G RAM G Act). The Union government champions the new legislation as a critical reform aimed at rectifying MGNREGA's inherent structural weaknesses and modernizing the employment guarantee scheme. Minister of Rural Development, Shivraj Singh Chouhan, stated the act will foster an integrated, enforceable employment guarantee that advances welfare through development.

Critics Warn of Rights Erosion

However, many who were instrumental in MGNREGA's creation view the VB-G RAM G Act as a fundamental shift away from a rights-based entitlement. They argue MGNREGA not only upheld the constitutional right to work but also facilitated the creation of vital rural assets, thereby bolstering the livelihoods of impoverished rural communities. Conversely, proponents of the new law dismiss MGNREGA as an inefficient welfare program that led to a substantial misallocation of public funds.

Hasty Enactment Sparks Controversy

The speed at which the VB-G RAM G Act was passed has drawn significant criticism. The bill cleared the Lok Sabha on December 18, 2025, and received presidential assent within three days. This rapid progression, especially given the significant fiscal and administrative responsibilities placed on state governments, has raised questions. Critics point to the lack of disclosed prior consultation with states, a move seen as contrary to the principles of cooperative federalism.

Procedural Safeguards Questioned

Further scrutiny surrounds the decision not to refer the legislation to a parliamentary standing or joint committee, a standard practice for major policy reforms. The government has not provided a public justification for bypassing these procedural safeguards, especially in the absence of any apparent emergency. This has led to concerns that the government might be replacing a statutory job guarantee with a discretionary central government scheme, potentially weakening the enforceability of employment provisions.

Key Provisions Under Fire

Central to the opposition's critique are several provisions within the new Act. Section 4(5) notably transforms the statutory employment guarantee into an allocation-based, centrally sponsored 'scheme'. This empowers the Union government to unilaterally determine annual state-wise allocations, potentially limiting states' ability to provide more extensive employment opportunities even if they wish to supplement central funding from their own resources.

Disclaimer:This content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, or trading advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. Readers should consult a SEBI-registered advisor before making investment decisions, as markets involve risk and past performance does not guarantee future results. The publisher and authors accept no liability for any losses. Some content may be AI-generated and may contain errors; accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. Views expressed do not reflect the publication’s editorial stance.