White House: Stablecoin Yields Don't Hurt Lending, Study Finds

BANKINGFINANCE
Whalesbook Logo
AuthorIshaan Verma|Published at:
White House: Stablecoin Yields Don't Hurt Lending, Study Finds
Overview

A White House report directly disputes banking industry claims that stablecoin yields harm lending. Economists found banning these yields would have negligible impact on credit creation, challenging a core argument used to stall crypto legislation. The study suggests the benefits of competitive consumer returns outweigh potential harms to bank lending.

Instant Stock Alerts on WhatsApp

Used by 10,000+ active investors

1

Add Stocks

Select the stocks you want to track in real time.

2

Get Alerts on WhatsApp

Receive instant updates directly to WhatsApp.

  • Quarterly Results
  • Concall Announcements
  • New Orders & Big Deals
  • Capex Announcements
  • Bulk Deals
  • And much more

White House Report Challenges Banking Claims

A White House report released Wednesday directly disputes banking industry claims that stablecoin yields harm overall lending. The analysis, from the Council of Economic Advisers (CEA), found that banning these rewards would have a minimal impact on how much credit is created.

How the Study Modeled the Impact

Economists used an economic model that included data from the Federal Reserve and FDIC on deposits, lending, and bank liquidity. They also looked at industry reports on stablecoin reserves and expert estimates of how consumers shift their money. The findings suggest that limiting 'yield-like' rewards from crypto platforms could do more harm than good, costing consumers benefits for little gain in bank lending.

White House Rebuts Banker Arguments

The report pushes back against the American Bankers Association's argument that stablecoin yields pull funds away from banks, reducing lending. White House economists believe this view misinterprets financial dynamics. Money used for stablecoins is often put into Treasury bills, which then get deposited back into other banks, keeping total deposits steady. This cycle means the effect on lending is much smaller than claimed.

Community Banks Face Little Impact

The report also addresses concerns that community banks would be hit hardest. It estimates that community banks would see only about $500 million, or 0.026%, of any potential increase in lending if yields were banned. Since most stablecoin activity is already with larger firms, the real impact on smaller lenders is expected to be minimal.

Consumer Benefits and Future Laws

Removing stablecoin yields would lower returns for users on a growing type of dollar-based asset, creating an overall cost for consumers. The study argues that policymakers need to show clear benefits to the broader economy from restricting stablecoin yields. This analysis could affect ongoing discussions about digital asset legislation in Congress, where lawmakers are working on a deal to move forward with the long-awaited bill.

Get stock alerts instantly on WhatsApp

Quarterly results, bulk deals, concall updates and major announcements delivered in real time.

Disclaimer:This content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, or trading advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. Readers should consult a SEBI-registered advisor before making investment decisions, as markets involve risk and past performance does not guarantee future results. The publisher and authors accept no liability for any losses. Some content may be AI-generated and may contain errors; accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. Views expressed do not reflect the publication’s editorial stance.