SBI Challenges Court's Spectrum View
SBI's petition argues the February 13 judgment has clear mistakes and fails to answer key legal questions about spectrum usage rights and their use as collateral. The bank believes the court focused too narrowly on spectrum as a government-controlled resource, ignoring how banks operate. A central point is whether lenders have a legal claim on spectrum usage rights and if these rights can be sold to recover debts during insolvency.
Impact on Loan Recovery
The dispute began with the 2018 insolvency of Aircel, which owed more than ₹13,000 crore to lenders led by SBI. The core disagreement is between the Department of Telecommunications, demanding payment of dues, and lenders trying to use spectrum usage rights as assets that can be recovered. The Supreme Court had previously ruled that spectrum, being a public resource, cannot be part of debt restructuring under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).
Wider Industry Impact
Banks warn that if this ruling remains, it could not only hurt recovery in the telecom sector but also in other regulated industries like mining, power, and infrastructure, where businesses rely on government-issued licenses. SBI's petition states the judgment could force banks to completely change how they assess credit risk. This might make them much less willing to fund projects that depend on these types of rights, possibly slowing down future growth and investment.
