Why Investors Fall Behind Market Returns
A key problem in India's financial markets is that investors often don't achieve the returns they expect, even when getting advice. While mutual funds provide professional management, many individual investors end up earning less than market benchmarks. This happens because of common investor mistakes like emotional decisions, bad timing, not adjusting their portfolios, or market quirks. These issues become more pronounced during volatile market periods. Recently, the Nifty 50 has even lagged behind global markets in 2025 and early 2026, pushing investors to seek better ways to manage their money.
New Firms Offer Hands-On Management
New portfolio management services (PMS) and wealth management firms are stepping in to tackle this issue directly. For instance, Ionic Wealth has quickly grown to manage over $1 billion in assets within two years, and PrimeInvestor aims for ₹10,000 crore in assets. These companies go beyond just giving advice; they actively build and manage client portfolios, including adjustments and strategic allocation. They target 'emerging affluent' individuals – typically professionals, often in tech, with ₹1 crore to ₹25 crore to invest. These investors are smart with money but lack time. The aim of these hybrid models is to overcome the common problems that lead self-directed investors and even some mutual fund holders to earn less than expected.
Market Growth and Key Players
India's wealth management sector is set for significant expansion, with AUM projected to hit $2.3 trillion by FY29, up from $1.1 trillion in FY24. PMS assets have also grown rapidly, reaching ₹8.37 lakh crore by September 2025, with a compound annual growth rate of 20.75% over the past decade. This growth has created a crowded market. Established banks like HDFC Bank and Kotak Mahindra, along with large brokers like Groww (which bought Fisdom), have advantages due to their large customer bases and strong reputations. New fintech companies and independent advisors are also competing, often using digital tools and lower fees to attract the same 'emerging affluent' clients.
Hurdles for New Wealth Managers
Even with strong market potential, newer wealth management firms face major challenges. The PMS sector is very fragmented, with over 500 companies competing fiercely for clients and staff. Smaller firms struggle with the high costs of meeting regulations, making it hard to grow. India's securities regulator, SEBI, is updating rules, which can add to operational challenges. Unlike mutual funds with long histories, PMS strategies offer flexibility but don't guarantee market-beating returns. Poor management can turn this flexibility into a disadvantage. Risks also include weak governance at smaller firms and the difficulty of gaining client trust for managing their money directly. While PMS fees can be high (1% to 2.5% yearly, plus performance fees), they must consistently beat market benchmarks to be worthwhile compared to cheaper mutual funds. In September FY26, net inflows into PMS dropped sharply, suggesting investors are becoming cautious due to market swings and are taking profits. This shows how vulnerable these strategies can be to market conditions.
What Lies Ahead
India's wealth management sector is expected to keep changing, with more demand for personalized advice and technology. New firms will succeed if they can handle complex regulations, show clear and steady results, and build strong internal management. We'll likely see more mergers as bigger companies buy smaller ones, and a stronger focus on hybrid models that combine technology with personal advice. The chance to fix the problem of investors missing market returns is real, but for lasting success, these firms must prove their long-term value beyond initial market momentum. They need to ensure their fees genuinely lead to better, risk-managed returns for investors in a complex financial world.
