Auto
|
Updated on 14th November 2025, 3:50 PM
Author
Abhay Singh | Whalesbook News Team
Tata Motors, led by MD & CEO Shailesh Chandra, strongly opposes lenient Corporate Average Fuel Efficiency (CAFE-III) norms for small cars, arguing it would compromise safety and distract from sustainable mobility. He stated there's no justification for special concessions based on weight or affordability, contradicting demands from Maruti Suzuki India and others within the auto industry body SIAM, which is divided on the issue.
▶
Shailesh Chandra, MD & CEO of Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles Ltd, has firmly stated that no special concessions should be granted to small cars under the upcoming Corporate Average Fuel Efficiency (CAFE-III) norms. Speaking during a Q2 earnings call, he argued that basing such leniency on weight or affordability would compromise vehicle safety standards and detract from the crucial goal of sustainable mobility. Chandra emphasized that Tata Motors has no concerns meeting CAFE norms even with a high percentage of small car sales, as defined by length and engine capacity under GST 2.0.
The issue highlights a significant division within the auto industry. While Maruti Suzuki India and others like Toyota Kirloskar and Honda Cars India have advocated for exemptions or easier norms for small cars, citing their focus on making larger vehicles more efficient, Tata Motors, Mahindra & Mahindra, Hyundai, and Kia India oppose this. Chandra specifically criticized attempts to define "small cars" by weight, asserting that such arbitrary criteria conflict with the imperative of safety. He noted that lighter vehicles often compromise safety reinforcements, and current industry data shows few cars below 909 kg meeting robust safety ratings like Bharat NCAP. He also pointed out that consumer preference is shifting towards safer, feature-rich compact SUVs, even at similar price points, making weight-based concessions potentially beneficial for relatively expensive cars that could shed safety features to meet arbitrary weight limits. Chandra concluded by urging focus on sustainable technologies like EVs and flex-fuel vehicles rather than debating small car norms.
The CAFE norms, implemented since 2017 and currently in their second phase (CAFE II), aim to limit average fuel consumption and CO2 emissions for manufacturers' fleets. The next phase, CAFE III, is expected to begin around April 2027, with draft regulations currently under discussion.
Impact: This debate directly influences the research, development, and manufacturing strategies of major automotive companies in India. It can affect investment decisions, product planning (e.g., focus on lightweight materials vs. robust safety features), and the pace of adoption of new technologies like electric vehicles. Companies that are forced to meet stricter norms without concessions may face higher compliance costs or need to accelerate their transition to cleaner technologies. The differing stances also reflect strategic positioning within the competitive Indian auto market. The impact on Indian stock market investors in the auto sector could be significant, affecting profitability and stock valuations depending on how the norms are finalized and how companies adapt. Rating: 8/10
Difficult Terms: * Corporate Average Fuel Efficiency (CAFE) norms: These are regulations set by governments to reduce the average fuel consumption and CO2 emissions of a manufacturer's fleet of vehicles sold in a specific period. * GST 2.0: Refers to the Goods and Services Tax regime in India, where "2.0" might imply an updated or revised version of the tax structure and its classifications. * SIAM (Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers): An apex industry body representing all major automobile manufacturers in India, promoting growth and development in the sector. * Bharat NCAP (New Car Assessment Programme): India's own vehicle safety rating program, which assesses the crashworthiness of new cars and awards them star ratings based on safety performance. * Sustainable Mobility: A broader concept encompassing transportation systems that are environmentally friendly, socially equitable, and economically viable, often including electric vehicles, public transport, and efficient fuel usage. * Compact SUVs: Sport Utility Vehicles that are smaller in size compared to traditional SUVs, offering a combination of SUV-like styling and features with car-like dimensions and fuel efficiency.