WinZo Director Challenges ED Probe Jurisdiction at Karnataka High Court

TECH
Whalesbook Logo
AuthorKavya Nair|Published at:
WinZo Director Challenges ED Probe Jurisdiction at Karnataka High Court
Overview

WinZo Games co-founder Saumya Rathore has petitioned the Karnataka High Court, contesting the Enforcement Directorate's money laundering investigation originating from Bengaluru. Rathore argues proceedings should occur in Delhi, citing company operations based there. The court has temporarily halted ED actions pending further hearing.

Legal Challenge Over ED Investigation

Saumya Rathore, co-founder and director of WinZo Games Pvt Ltd, has filed a plea with the Karnataka High Court, challenging the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) decision to conduct its money laundering investigation from Bengaluru. The gaming company executive argues that the probe and related court proceedings rightfully belong in Delhi, where WinZo's primary operations are based.

Arguments on Jurisdiction

Rathore's senior counsel, Sajan Poovayya, contended that WinZo's bank accounts, employees, and core business activities are all situated in Delhi. He questioned the ED's choice of Bengaluru for the investigation, suggesting it was arbitrary. Poovayya emphasized that the ED, despite being a pan-India agency, should adhere to logical jurisdictional principles.

ED's Counter and Court's Interim Order

Representing the ED, advocate Madhu N Rao argued for the plea's non-maintainability, highlighting that ₹800 crore has already been attached in the matter. He asserted the ED's authority to investigate across India, particularly as allegations of platform misuse by hundreds of players have surfaced. Justice M Nagaprasanna heard the submissions and directed the ED not to take further precipitative action against Rathore until the next hearing on January 14.

Impact on Co-founder

The legal challenge also touches upon the ongoing detention of co-founder Paavan Nanda, whose remand by a Bengaluru court is being contested on jurisdictional grounds. Rathore's plea, however, is specifically on the location of the probe, not the ED's power to investigate itself. The court adjourned the hearing, stating it would decide on January 14 without adjournment.

Disclaimer:This content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, or trading advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. Readers should consult a SEBI-registered advisor before making investment decisions, as markets involve risk and past performance does not guarantee future results. The publisher and authors accept no liability for any losses. Some content may be AI-generated and may contain errors; accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. Views expressed do not reflect the publication’s editorial stance.