Widening Wealth Chasm
Economic inequality in India is surging, marked by a dramatic divergence between income and wealth disparities. While the nation grapples with elevated income inequality, the extent of wealth inequality is considerably more pronounced, according to recent analyses.
Income vs. Wealth Disparity
Data indicates that for every rupee earned, wealth is distributed far more unevenly. The top 1 percent of the population now controls approximately 40 percent of the nation's total wealth. In stark contrast, the bottom 50 percent collectively holds only about 6 percent of the total wealth. This concentration highlights a profound imbalance.
The income ratio, comparing the top 10 percent to the bottom 50 percent, stands at 3.87, signaling substantial income inequality. However, this figure pales in comparison to wealth distribution, where the concentration at the very top is extreme. The income Gini coefficient has climbed from an estimated 0.47 in 2000 to around 0.61 in 2023.
Consumption Data Misleads
Consumption inequality appears to be relatively low, with India's consumption Gini dropping to approximately 0.255 in 2022-23. Some reports even suggest India ranks among nations with low consumption inequality. However, these figures often fail to capture saved income, investments, and the full spectrum of wealth holdings, potentially masking the true depth of economic disparities.
Policy and Social Spending Concerns
Structural factors like uneven economic growth favoring high-skill sectors and property income earners, alongside persistently unequal access to education and healthcare, drive inequality. Policy interventions have often involved regressive taxation, further entrenching these disparities. A significant shift away from social-sector spending, which has fallen to approximately 17 percent of the total expenditure in the Union Budget 2024-25, is a major concern.
Budgetary priorities are increasingly diverging from essential welfare functions. Allocations for health and education have notably declined as a share of overall expenditure. The recent replacement of the demand-driven Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme with a supply-determined program places further financial strain on state governments and disproportionately impacts the most vulnerable citizens.