Finance Commission Targets Dormant PSEs for Closure

ECONOMY
Whalesbook Logo
AuthorAarav Shah|Published at:
Finance Commission Targets Dormant PSEs for Closure
Overview

The 16th Finance Commission has recommended the immediate closure of inactive Public Sector Enterprises (PSEs) to alleviate the significant fiscal strain they impose on central and state governments. The panel, chaired by economist Arvind Panagariya, highlighted that valuable land and building assets held by these dormant firms could be repurposed. Persistent losses across many PSEs, coupled with slow privatization progress, underscore the need for decisive action to improve economic growth contributions.

### The Fiscal Drag of Dormant Enterprises
The 16th Finance Commission has identified a substantial fiscal burden stemming from inactive and underperforming Public Sector Enterprises (PSEs) across India. The commission's report advocates for the immediate closure of these dormant entities, citing their considerable strain on government finances. This recommendation aims to redirect resources and improve overall economic efficiency. The panel emphasizes that the land and buildings owned by such inactive PSEs represent valuable assets that could be redeployed for more productive uses, thereby generating revenue and enhancing resource allocation.

### Unproductive Assets and Persistent Losses
An extensive review by the commission, referenced in its report, reveals significant underutilization of assets within the public sector. As of March 31, 2024, 72 Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSEs) were identified as holding unproductive assets, with 17 of these already under liquidation and 24 approved for closure. At the state level, a concerning 308 out of 1,635 State Public Sector Enterprises (SPSEs) have ceased operations. Financial performance remains a critical issue, with nearly one-third of audited CPSEs incurring annual losses ranging between ₹36,213 crore and ₹51,419 crore over the last four fiscal years. State-level PSEs present a similar picture, with 489 out of 1,055 SPSEs posting a combined deficit of ₹1.14 lakh crore in fiscal year 2022-23.

### Slow Progress on Privatization and Proposed Reforms
The commission acknowledged the New Public Sector Enterprise Policy, adopted in February 2021, which commits to closing or privatizing CPSEs in non-strategic sectors. However, the report notes that while the closure of loss-making enterprises has gained momentum, progress on privatization has been notably slow. Drawing from historical experiences of privatization between 1999 and 2004, which yielded significant efficiency gains, the commission suggests that similar benefits could be realized through the privatization of CPSEs and SPSEs in non-strategic sectors. To inject greater financial discipline, the report proposes a rule of thumb: any enterprise consistently incurring losses in three out of four consecutive years should be mandatorily presented to the Cabinet for a definitive decision on its closure, privatization, or continuation. This approach is intended to streamline the public sector and ensure it contributes more effectively to national economic growth.

### Broader Economic Context
The financial drain from underperforming PSEs directly impacts the government's fiscal deficit, diverting essential funds from development initiatives and public services. Past attempts at PSE reform and privatization have met with mixed success, but the current economic climate and the commission's strong recommendations suggest a renewed focus on addressing these long-standing inefficiencies.

Disclaimer:This content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, or trading advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. Readers should consult a SEBI-registered advisor before making investment decisions, as markets involve risk and past performance does not guarantee future results. The publisher and authors accept no liability for any losses. Some content may be AI-generated and may contain errors; accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. Views expressed do not reflect the publication’s editorial stance.