SBI MF Lead Shrinks as ICICI Prudential Charges Ahead in Fund Race

BANKINGFINANCE
Whalesbook Logo
AuthorKavya Nair|Published at:
SBI MF Lead Shrinks as ICICI Prudential Charges Ahead in Fund Race
Overview

ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund is rapidly closing the AUM gap with industry leader SBI Mutual Fund, now trailing by just ₹1.7 lakh crore. While SBI MF's lead includes significant EPFO-linked ETF assets, ICICI Pru MF's broad-based equity performance and asset growth suggest a fierce contest for market supremacy. The widening gap with HDFC MF further cements the top two's dominance, signaling a shift towards performance and distribution strength.

The Tightening Contest

The race for the top spot in India's mutual fund industry has intensified, with ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund (ICICI Pru MF) significantly narrowing the asset gap against market leader SBI Mutual Fund (SBI MF). As of December 2025, SBI MF managed ₹12.48 lakh crore in average assets under management (AAUM), while ICICI Pru MF stood at ₹10.76 lakh crore. This leaves ICICI Pru MF just ₹1.7 lakh crore behind, a stark reduction from previous gaps. Simultaneously, the disparity between ICICI Pru MF and third-placed HDFC Mutual Fund (HDFC MF) has widened considerably, now exceeding ₹1.5 lakh crore.

Structural Advantage Masks True Competition

A significant portion of SBI MF's reported lead stems from structural allocations, not active market competition. Approximately 27% of its AAUM, totaling around ₹3.43 lakh crore, is concentrated in Nifty 50 and Sensex Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs). These allocations are driven by long-term investments from the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO), a flow initiated in 2015.

"ICICI Prudential is already the market leader in any meaningful competitive sense," stated Dhirendra Kumar, CEO of Value Research. He added that without these "privileged" EPFO AUMs, ICICI's leadership is built on superior performance, disciplined product offerings, and consistent execution.

Performance Powers ICICI Prudential's Ascent

Data supports ICICI Pru MF's competitive edge. In 2025, it featured among the top five performers in 13 out of 15 equity categories tracked by Value Research. SBI MF, by contrast, had only five schemes in the top five positions and one in the bottom five. Over three- and five-year horizons, ICICI Pru MF's large-cap funds delivered average returns of roughly 27.5% and 30%, significantly outpacing SBI MF's approximately 15% returns.

Momentum has shifted distinctly since late 2024. Following its widest AAUM gap of ₹2.57 lakh crore in September 2024, ICICI Pru MF has seen its assets grow by 44%. HDFC MF grew 37.7%, while SBI MF experienced a more moderate 28% growth in the same period.

Broad-Based Growth and Investor Focus

ICICI Pru MF's rapid asset expansion is broad-based, not reliant on a few standout schemes. Mohit Mangal, vice president of research at Centrum, noted that its five largest equity-oriented schemes accounted for 53% of AUM as of September end, compared to 58.6% for the top 10 AMCs collectively, with no single scheme dominating. Individual investors constitute about 60% of its AUM, a consistent trend.

Financial analysts also point to ICICI Pru AMC's strong net equity inflows and a superior equity yield of 67 basis points, attributed partly to lower distributor payouts. Its non-mutual fund business contributes 9.2% to revenue, higher than many peers. These factors suggest ICICI Pru AMC may command a valuation premium over competitors.

Disclaimer:This content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, or trading advice, nor a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. Readers should consult a SEBI-registered advisor before making investment decisions, as markets involve risk and past performance does not guarantee future results. The publisher and authors accept no liability for any losses. Some content may be AI-generated and may contain errors; accuracy and completeness are not guaranteed. Views expressed do not reflect the publication’s editorial stance.